<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <atom:link href="http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/rss/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <title>FSI - Latest Discussions - COMSOL Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/</link>
  <description>Most recent forum discussions</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
  
  <item>
   <title>Airfoil in Air using FSI </title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28677/</link>
   <description>Hi, &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am trying to compute an FSI simulation of an airfoil with a constant wind flowing from the right to the left with slip wall condition. The model will converge if the Re number is low (less than 10^5). As I increase my Re, the model will not converge. In additional, my inlet ramp flow velocity will need to be increase very slowly before it reaches constant. I am wondering if there is something wrong in my setup?  Or, can FSI be used for high Re. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am wondering if anybody can point me to the right direction. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks a million in advance!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ting&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1337207474.28677</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Moving Interior Wall in cdf</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28620/</link>
   <description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am studying pipe flow, currently in 2D.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I have placed a rigid interior wall, making a certain angle with the direction of flow, inside the pipe. Ideally, I would like it to rotate 'freely' around its first edge (see picture, the red point would be the axis). As of now, I am only using the Laminar Flow module.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
By freely, I mean subjected to the flow. How can I achieve this?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
1) the freely rotating axis&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2) make the mesh follow the interior wall&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am reading this http://www.comsol.com/support/knowledgebase/970/ and looking for examples.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thank you&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1337091958.28620</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Inflation of a cavity filled with a compressible fluid</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28347/</link>
   <description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I'm trying to model a cavity being filled with a compressible fluid. The cavity is pressurized, due theoretically to the intrusion of new fluid, which causes deformation of the elastic domain surrounding it.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I've tried to model this using Structural mechanics and applying a load on the boundary of a sphere (embedded within another bigger domain) but my solution doesn't seem to account for the compressibility of the sphere. Any idea of what I'm doing wrong ?? Should I use fsi instead of Structural Mechanics ??&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks a lot !&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Karen.</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 05:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1336109300.28347</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>FSI+Rotating mechinery</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28207/</link>
   <description>hello, I am ready to simulate the strength of strired tank of baffle. I used the Rotating Mechinery model and the plan strain model. when I initial the model,  the comsol 3.5 gives error:Messages:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	Failed to evaluate expression&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	- Expression: cos(-2*pi*rpm*t)*X-sin(-2*pi*rpm*t)*Y&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	Failed to evaluate variable&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	- Variable: t&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	- Geometry: 1&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
	- Boundaries: 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23, ...&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Can anyone help me fix this error?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thank you!</description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1335594481.28207</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>two values at a single node</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28203/</link>
   <description>I have an FSI model.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
When I try to output the WSS on a particular edge, I notice that there are atleast 20 points where I have two values for WSS i.e., at each of these 20 points, there are two values for WSS. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am not sure why this is happening. It looks like COMSOL is counting each point twice and I cannot understand why its happening. I am using the union option to create the geometry. So at two intersecting edges, only one point should be accounted for.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I appreciate if someone can clarify what's going on.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Sirisha</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1335565663.28203</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>converting COMSOL code to the MATLAB ???</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/28149/</link>
   <description> Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I'm working with COMSOL to simulate a chemical  experience, but it takes too much time to display the results.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
So i want to find a link between comsol and matlab if i can convert the code of comsol to matlab that will be faster than using comsol alone !!!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
So am asking if i can do this and how ????&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
watting your answer &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
thank you very much :)&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1335439303.28149</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Postprocessing of Fluid structure interaction result</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27890/</link>
   <description>Hi, dear all, &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am trying out the FSI module, and my model somewhat get converge.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I apply the inlet a pulse wave inlet uniform velocity, with outlet pressure=0, things goes well, but at 10.5s, the sin wave do not looks like what it should look, as 1st attachment. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I want to know what is going wrong so l use laminar flow module, all things go well as attach,a wave occur. as in second attachment &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
both use time dependent solver and exactly the same solver setting.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
so i suspect the error comes from the solid mechanics during fluid structure interaction. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
is anyone share experience with me?may i know how i can fix the small &amp;quot;dip&amp;quot; at the last second?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1334708338.27890</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Meshing Using Geometry Difference Feature</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27827/</link>
   <description>I'm doing a project for an aerospace class in which I'm completing a fluid-structure analysis of a balloon design. In order to generate the balloon structure and interior helium I used a difference in geometry (See the attached COMSOL model). When I go to mesh the model setup I recieve an error that domain 2, the balloon domain, doesn't mesh properly. I figure there may be an issue with the geometry difference feature. Can anyone provide any insight on my issue? I wish to generate a mesh of the entire model ASAP.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thank you in advance!</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1334524547.27827</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>FSI - stationary problem - parametric vs single studies</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27599/</link>
   <description>I am working on a model that uses the COMSOL in-built FSI physics. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am running a stationary study .However my inlet and outlet boundary conditions are dependent on time &amp;quot;t&amp;quot;. So I set &amp;quot;t&amp;quot; as a parameter and define its value to run the stationary study.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Now, the issue I am facing is, I want to solve the stationary problem for several &amp;quot;t&amp;quot; t=0:0.1:1. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I can set this up by using the &amp;quot;continuation parameter&amp;quot; and use the parametric solver for the solution. But when I do this, the problem fails to converge for any &amp;quot;t&amp;quot; other than t=0. It fails due to inverted mesh elements. In order to get rid of the inverted mesh elements, I tried using linear shape order, I tried several different meshes but it still does not work for fine meshes (it works for a couple of coarse meshes though but that mesh density is not good enough for my study). &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
However, the very same stationary problem works if I set up 10 different studies (Each study corresponding to each t i.e., t=0 is one study, t=0.1 is another study ....t=1 is another study). I don't understand why this is happening and I am hoping that someone has an explanation or a suggestion to troubleshoot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks for the help.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Sirisha&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1333660241.27599</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Viscous Fluid damping</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27559/</link>
   <description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am trying to calculate the Q-factor for micro-mechanical resonators in fluids. To do this, I have to use FSI interface (navier stokes equation), doing a transient simulation and then calculate Q-factor.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
However, The problem is that time domain simulations take a lot of time. So, could I use thermo-acoustic model in COMSOL which is based on linearized NS for viscous damping calculation ? &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Also, what is the difference between using FSI (NS) and thermoacoustic solid interaction model (linearized NS)?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Is it all about the amplitude of solid displacement ?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Waiting for your reply &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Regards,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Mohamed</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1333605997.27559</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Need some help in meshing, inverted mesh elements warnings</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27295/</link>
   <description>I have an FSI problem, by moving a membrane I would like to see the fluid move. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
When I setup the simulation, I've played around with the settings, looked at how other models were setup, but I can't get rid of the 'inverted mesh elements' warnings.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Does anyone have any advice on this model?</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1332833017.27295</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>pulse response of FSI problem</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27174/</link>
   <description>I'm investigating an FSI problem. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I'm interested in the frequency response of a membrane of a reservoir with water but I have found that a frequency analysis with FSI can be a bit tricky. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Instead, I have done a pulse response of the membrane. By applying a force pulse using a smoothed step function on the top of the membrane. I then decrease the time steps and smoothness of the pulse to find the point at which the membrane will 'ring'. From this ringing, I can deduce the first resonant frequency.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The ringing can be seen by plotting the centre deflection (fsi.disp) as a function of time. I've included this plot, as a reference, the applied step function is plotted as well, (scaled so you can compare it).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Currently, I'm using a 2D model with 'coarser' mesh.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
For the solver, I clear the update scaled absolute tolerance in the time stepping field.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I find I need to switch to 'fully coupled' solver at shorter time intervals for the simulation to work.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I would like to expand this simulation to a 3D problem. Currently I'm solving for: 29730 dof and the solution time is 344 s. (5 minutes, 44 seconds). (core i3, winXP 64-bit, 8GB of ram)&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
When I switch to 3D the computing time is going to increase a lot.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The first question is: Is this a valid method of simulating the device, to get an idea of the resonance frequency?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Secondly: what can I do to decrease the computation time, keeping in mind that in 3D the mesh will be much larger.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1332414603.27174</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Gear Pump Modeling</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27157/</link>
   <description>I am looking for anyone to share their experiences in modeling a gear pump in COMSOL. I am looking for feedback on modules that were used, setup of problem incl. boundary conditions, as well as solver configurations.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thank you in advance,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Andreas.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1332340903.27157</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>FSI problem: wall tension plot</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/27143/</link>
   <description>Hi, &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I have a FSI model (balloon filled with water) which solved successfully, however I don't know if I can plot wall tension of the balloon. Anyone know how to plot wall tension (or wall stress) in COMSOL?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Looking forward for your help. Thanks!</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1332330103.27143</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Simulating fluid structural interaction, without the structural part?</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/26535/</link>
   <description>The ultimate goal is to simulate the workings of a membrane pump.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
In order to learn more about the pump, and also comsol, I want to first forego simulating the mechanical part.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
What I would like to do is: model a reservoir with two open boundarys and see how the fluid flows if I change the shape of one wall of the reservoir. This wall is the membrane. At this moment, I am not interested in the structural properties of he membrane. I want a prescribed movement of that wall. which will be in the form a squared sine function. So I want the shape of the wall to change over time. (vibrate) and see how this influences the liquid in the reservoir.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
It is not the same as doing a parametric sweep and changing the model shape. This just reruns the same simulation with a different shape, it doesn't 'remember' the previous condition with respect to conservation of mass.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
An alternative is to model the membrane wall as an inlet and applying a varying inflow velocity. This is okay, but it doesn't show in the graphs that I'm actuall changing the shape of the membrane.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Any suggestions on how to simulate this? Will I need to use FSI?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Many thanks for any suggestions.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
-Jaap&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
 &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1330521762.26535</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>boundary conditions</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/26487/</link>
   <description>Dear all,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I have an incompressible fluid flow problem. If i have only inlet but no outlet in the model (the mass conservation is fulfilled by expanding volume), which boundary condition (velocity or pressure) is best to be implemented? &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
In fluid flow (laminar flow) model, is it a reference pressure must be defined somewhere in the model? If yes, is that mean I hv to find a way to define  reference pressure if i use velocity as inlet condition?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
What if FSI physics - is there any reference pressure needed?</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1330424893.26487</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>solver configuration setting</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/25283/</link>
   <description>&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
  Hi:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
     Would some one teach me what the solver configuration means? When I follow the inkjet model, it says set &amp;quot;dependent variables 2, mod1_u, scale&amp;quot; as 10, and set &amp;quot;mod1_p&amp;quot; as1e4. What does that mean?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
  Thanks a lot. </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1326124876.25283</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Asynchronous Machine time dependent startup, singularity error</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/20971/</link>
   <description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am trying to simulate a ASM in the rotating machines physics, time dependent.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The Stator slots are coupled to the electrical circuit physics for a Voltage excitation&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The rotor slots are also coupled there to define the short circuit resistants.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am using the ODE Interface for a rotation velocity equation.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
When simulating for 20ms, with a timestep of 1ms(or less), everything is fine (rotor slowly starts rotating).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
But when I want to calculate for a longer time,  the computation stops somewhen in the middle, saying something like:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;Repeated error test failures. May have reached a singularity.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Last time step is not converged.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I choose the mesh as extremely fine and tried a step size of 55us.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
As &amp;quot;Maximum Step&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Initial Step&amp;quot; I'm using the same value as for &amp;quot;Step Size&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
But it does not help...&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Does anybody have any advice?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks in advance&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1311264012.20971</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Automatic Remeshing for Moving Meshes</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/20166/</link>
   <description>According to the release notes, version 4.2 is supposed to have a new automatic remeshing feature for moving meshes:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;quot;For a simulation that includes a moving mesh, a new automatic remeshing feature makes more extreme deformation states possible. When the mesh is deformed beyond a user-defined mesh quality threshold, the automatic remeshing activates, and the simulation is automatically continued, starting from the new mesh.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
However, I am working with a fluid-structure interaction model, and I can't seem to get this feature to work nor find any mention of it in the documentation or help files.  Has anybody tried this out?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
John</description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1309266325.20166</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>in 2D fsi mode , i cant define &quot;contact pair&quot; ?</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.co.in/community/forums/fsi/thread/19828/</link>
   <description>Dear Dr. Ivar,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I am trying to simulate natural heart valve in 2D fsi mode. when leaflets contact an error occurred.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Repeated error test failures. May have reached a singularity.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Time : 0.002592892726514386&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Last time step is not converged.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
When I define “contact pair” in definition and add “contact 1” in fsi node , I get error:&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Failed to find consistent initial values.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Last time step is not converged.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
How can I use contact pair? Or is there another way to modeling this example?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Please help me&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thank you so much!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">.1308502812.19828</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>

